Hugo nominees: Best Novelette
Jul. 31st, 2012 05:58 pm1. "Six Months, Three Days" by Charlie Jane Anders
This is one that I nominated-- I adore time travel, and this story really delves into all the things I adore most about it. It's a perfect way of smashing two concepts of time together, but it's also a way of exploring two different people, and two ways of approaching life, and how those differences emerge. I adore it.
2. "What We Found" by Geoff Ryman
Quiet, but engrossing and compelling. Beautifully-realized. It doesn't feel like science fiction for a while, but once it does, it becomes a perfect reflection of the story itself.
3. "Fields of Gold" by Rachel Swirsky
Compelling, despite the fact that I disliked everybody in it. Reminded me of A Brief History of the Dead, but mostly in a way that made me want to re-read the other story. But, well-crafted, never generic, and fully-realized.
4. "Ray of Light" by Brad R. Torgersen
Well-written and well-conceived, but somehow less substantial than the others. The characters felt more like sketches or placeholders than people in their own right. And somehow it felt a little too pat for the sun to have returned after less than a generation, especially given the comparison to previous ice ages. But I liked it.
5. No Award
"The Copenhagen Interpretation" by Paul Cornell
Nearly unreadable. I gave up. I'll assume, generously, that this is part of some kind of series, and that's how it got nominated despite giving so little context I was surprised to discover that we were in a spacefaring future a third of the way along. It's good for a story to subtly interweave its novel elements into the story, rather than doing infodumps or belaboring the details, but you still have to put that information in somewhere near the beginning. By the time I'm three-quarters done with the story, I should have some idea of the restrictions of the setting and the probably consequences of the characters' choices.
This is one that I nominated-- I adore time travel, and this story really delves into all the things I adore most about it. It's a perfect way of smashing two concepts of time together, but it's also a way of exploring two different people, and two ways of approaching life, and how those differences emerge. I adore it.
2. "What We Found" by Geoff Ryman
Quiet, but engrossing and compelling. Beautifully-realized. It doesn't feel like science fiction for a while, but once it does, it becomes a perfect reflection of the story itself.
3. "Fields of Gold" by Rachel Swirsky
Compelling, despite the fact that I disliked everybody in it. Reminded me of A Brief History of the Dead, but mostly in a way that made me want to re-read the other story. But, well-crafted, never generic, and fully-realized.
4. "Ray of Light" by Brad R. Torgersen
Well-written and well-conceived, but somehow less substantial than the others. The characters felt more like sketches or placeholders than people in their own right. And somehow it felt a little too pat for the sun to have returned after less than a generation, especially given the comparison to previous ice ages. But I liked it.
5. No Award
"The Copenhagen Interpretation" by Paul Cornell
Nearly unreadable. I gave up. I'll assume, generously, that this is part of some kind of series, and that's how it got nominated despite giving so little context I was surprised to discover that we were in a spacefaring future a third of the way along. It's good for a story to subtly interweave its novel elements into the story, rather than doing infodumps or belaboring the details, but you still have to put that information in somewhere near the beginning. By the time I'm three-quarters done with the story, I should have some idea of the restrictions of the setting and the probably consequences of the characters' choices.